ECI defends decision-making process amid criticism, citing Article 324 and electoral reforms

Hindustan Times - India · 25 Sept 2026 · 2 min read
Prelims · Polity Mains · GS2 Governance High relevance

The Election Commission of India (ECI) defended its decision-making process and digital security protocols amid criticism, emphasizing its constitutional mandate under Article 324 and highlighting 40 new electoral reforms.

Key points

Election Commission of India (ECI) responded to criticism by stating that differing views among commissioners are part of normal deliberation and decision-making processes.

ECI emphasized its constitutional mandate under Article 324, which grants it supervisory powers over elections, ensuring all actions comply with statutory rules and institutional conventions.

The commission highlighted its 40 new electoral reforms, including the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, as evidence of its proactive governance.

ECI defended its digital platforms like ECINet, stating they operate under strict data security protocols to prevent unauthorized tampering or manipulation.

The commission clarified that internal notes and observations, including those from election commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, are routine and part of checks-and-balances mechanisms.

[GS2-Governance] The controversy underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in electoral governance, a recurring theme in UPSC Mains questions on institutional integrity.

ECI refuted claims of unauthorized changes to Form 6, stating that a separate declaration form was introduced as part of the SIR process, not an amendment to Form 6 itself.

The commission dismissed the figure of 130 million voter deletions as misleading, clarifying that appeals in West Bengal were not filed by ECI.

Way Forward: ECI should enhance transparency by publishing internal deliberation summaries, establish a public grievance redressal mechanism for electoral roll disputes, and conduct regular audits of digital platforms to bolster trust in electoral processes.

Key terms

Article 324

Article 324 of the Indian Constitution vests the Election Commission with the power of superintendence, direction, and control of elections. It is foundational to India's electoral governance, ensuring free and fair elections through an independent constitutional body.

Special Intensive Revision (SIR)

A periodic electoral roll revision process conducted by ECI to update voter lists, remove duplicates, and ensure accuracy. It is critical for maintaining electoral integrity and preventing voter fraud, often scrutinized for its implementation and transparency.

ECINet

The Election Commission's digital network for managing electoral processes, including voter registration and data management. Its security protocols are vital for preventing cyber threats and ensuring the integrity of electoral data.

Electoral Reforms

Systematic changes aimed at improving the electoral process, such as enhancing voter accessibility, ensuring transparency, and reducing malpractices. These reforms are central to GS2 discussions on governance and institutional efficiency.