Model Code of Conduct Violations: 1,334 Tenders Issued in Poll-Bound States Within 48 Hours

Updated 20 Mar 2026

Contents4

Hindustan Times - India · 19 Mar 2026 · 2 min read
Prelims · Polity Mains · GS2 Governance High relevance

Government departments in four poll-bound states issued 1,334 tenders within 48 hours of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) coming into effect, raising concerns about electoral integrity and governance compliance.

Key points

Model Code of Conduct (MCC) violations occurred in West Bengal (865 tenders), Kerala (284), Assam (96), and Tamil Nadu (89) within 48 hours of MCC enforcement on March 15, 2026.

Election Commission of India (ECI) stated no permissions were granted for these tenders, which cover routine development works like roads, hospitals, and anganwadi centers—explicitly barred under MCC.

Part VII of MCC prohibits governments from initiating tender processes during elections without ECI approval, making these actions prima facie violations.

Representation of the People Act, 1951 Section 123 treats misuse of public funds to influence voters as corrupt practice, potentially applicable here.

[GS2-Governance] This reflects systemic governance failures in adhering to electoral norms, undermining the level playing field essential for free and fair elections.

State officials offered contradictory explanations—West Bengal claimed repairs to old projects, Kerala blamed local bodies, while Assam denied awareness of tenders.

Historical pattern observed: Similar violations occurred in 2021 with 325 tenders, but 2026 figures show a 310% increase in MCC breaches.

Technical Wing of ECI is reviewing all tender documents, with action promised against responsible engineers and officials.

[GS3-Economy] The rush of tenders indicates possible pre-election economic stimulus through public works, despite MCC restrictions on such spending.

Way Forward: ECI should implement real-time tender monitoring systems, impose mandatory pre-clearance for all government contracts during MCC period, and establish faster adjudication mechanisms for MCC violations with strict penalties for repeat offenders.

Key terms

Model Code of Conduct (MCC)
A set of guidelines issued by the Election Commission of India under Article 324 of the Constitution to ensure free and fair elections. It restricts governments from announcing new schemes, making appointments, or undertaking fresh public works that could influence voters once elections are announced. MCC's constitutional significance lies in its role as a non-statutory but enforceable framework for electoral integrity.
Representation of the People Act, 1951 Section 123
Defines 'corrupt practices' in elections, including bribery, undue influence, and misuse of official power. Section 123(7) specifically prohibits the use of government machinery for electoral advantage. This provision gives statutory teeth to MCC violations, with penalties including election nullification.
Election Commission of India
A constitutional body established under Article 324 vested with superintendence, direction, and control of elections. Its authority to enforce MCC derives from this broad mandate, making its directives binding on both central and state governments during elections.
Level Playing Field
A principle of electoral democracy ensuring equal opportunity for all political parties and candidates. MCC operationalizes this principle by preventing the ruling party from using state resources for electoral advantage, crucial for maintaining public trust in democratic processes.

Practice question

Critically analyze the implications of widespread Model Code of Conduct violations through last-minute tender issuances in poll-bound states, with reference to recent incidents. What measures can strengthen electoral governance in this regard? (250 words, 15 marks)

GS2 15 marks 250 words Mains

Key terms to include: Model Code of Conduct Article 324 Representation of the People Act 1951 Level Playing Field Electoral Integrity Corrupt Practices Election Commission of India Public Accountability

Answer framework

Introduction

Briefly introduce the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) and its purpose in ensuring free and fair elections. Mention the recent incident of 1,334 tenders issued in poll-bound states as a case study.

Governance Challenges

Systemic non-compliance by state machinery despite clear MCC provisions under Part VII

Contradictory explanations by states (e.g., West Bengal's repair claims vs Kerala's local body blame) reflecting accountability gaps

310% increase in violations compared to 2021, indicating normalization of MCC breaches

Electoral Integrity Risks

Undermines level playing field by allowing potential misuse of public funds (Section 123 of RPA, 1951)

ECI's reactive rather than preventive enforcement approach

Possible economic stimulus through public works influencing voter behavior

Institutional Measures Needed

Real-time tender monitoring systems integrated with ECI's Technical Wing

Mandatory pre-clearance for all government contracts during MCC period

Strict penalties for repeat offenders including election nullification provisions

Conclusion

Emphasize the need for both technological solutions and political will to uphold MCC's constitutional spirit under Article 324. Suggest periodic audits of state compliance.

Fact check

All facts verified