MoRTH proposes construction-ready highway contracts to curb delays and cost overruns

Updated 6 May 2026

Contents4

Livemint - Economy · 6 May 2026 · 2 min read
Prelims · Infrastructure Mains · GS3 Economy High relevance

The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) plans to award highway contracts only after securing 90% land acquisition and structural clearances, addressing key bottlenecks that caused road construction to drop to 9,380 km in FY26 - the lowest since FY18.

Key points

MoRTH is implementing stricter pre-award filters requiring 90% land acquisition and clearance for built-up structures before contract awards, directly addressing two major causes of highway project delays.

Highway construction dropped to 9,380 km in FY26 from 12,349 km in FY24, with delayed projects worth ₹4 trillion - half delayed by up to 6 months, others by 1-3 years.

Delhi-Dehradun expressway exemplifies delays caused by pending structure clearances, with partial operations starting in 2025 despite 2021 tender award.

[GS3-Economy] The policy shift from rapid contract awards to project readiness aims to improve private sector participation through better risk allocation in Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) projects.

580 national highway projects were delayed as of July 2025, with land acquisition (33%), contractor issues, and forest clearances (33%) being primary causes.

This connects to GS2-Governance by demonstrating institutional learning in infrastructure delivery, building on earlier reforms like time-bound milestone tracking for land/environmental clearances.

The policy aligns with National Infrastructure Pipeline goals by reducing average project delays from 3+ years (85 projects) through systematic de-risking.

[GS4-Ethics] Pre-clearing built-up structures addresses ethical concerns about arbitrary contract awards without resolving displacement impacts on communities.

Way Forward: India should institutionalize GIS-based land bank systems for real-time acquisition tracking, establish fast-track dispute resolution for structures, and mandate environmental clearance clustering for corridor projects.

Key terms

Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM)
A public-private partnership model for highway development where government bears 40% of construction cost during building phase and remaining 60% as annuity payments plus interest over 15 years. Its UPSC relevance lies in balancing risk-sharing between public and private sectors while addressing infrastructure financing challenges.
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH)
The central ministry responsible for national highway development and transport policies. Its constitutional significance stems from Entry 23 of Union List (highways declared as national highways) and its role in implementing PM Gati Shakti's multi-modal connectivity vision.
Land Acquisition
The process of acquiring private land for public infrastructure projects under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. For UPSC, it's critical for understanding infrastructure governance challenges balancing development needs with property rights under Article 300A.
National Highways Authority of India (NHAI)
The statutory body under MoRTH established by NHAI Act, 1988 to develop/maintain national highways. Its UPSC relevance includes implementing Bharatmala Pariyojana and evolving PPP models while facing challenges like ₹29,000 crore arbitration liabilities (SC compensation ruling).

Practice question

Critically analyze the proposed policy shift by MoRTH to award highway contracts only after securing 90% land acquisition and structural clearances. How does this address the persistent issues of delays and cost overruns in highway projects? (250 words, 15 marks)

GS3 15 marks 250 words Mains

Key terms to include: Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) Land Acquisition National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) Bharatmala Pariyojana PM Gati Shakti Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 National Infrastructure Pipeline

Answer framework

Introduction

Briefly introduce the context of highway project delays in India and the new MoRTH policy. Mention the drop in highway construction from 12,349 km in FY24 to 9,380 km in FY26.

Addressing Land Acquisition Challenges

Land acquisition delays account for 33% of project delays (580 projects as of July 2025).

90% acquisition requirement ensures fewer legal disputes and smoother project execution.

Connects to Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013.

Structural Clearance Bottlenecks

Pending clearances for built-up structures cause significant delays (e.g., Delhi-Dehradun expressway).

New policy mandates clearance resolution before contract awards.

Aligns with National Infrastructure Pipeline goals by reducing average delays from 3+ years.

Impact on Private Sector Participation

Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) benefits from better risk allocation.

Reduces arbitration liabilities (e.g., ₹29,000 crore NHAI liabilities).

Enhances investor confidence through systematic de-risking.

Ethical and Governance Dimensions

Prevents arbitrary contract awards without resolving displacement impacts.

Institutional learning demonstrated through time-bound milestone tracking.

Supports PM Gati Shakti's multi-modal connectivity vision.

Conclusion

Suggest way forward: Institutionalize GIS-based land bank systems, fast-track dispute resolution, and mandate environmental clearance clustering for corridor projects.

Fact check

Issues found Overall severity: medium

Highway construction dropped to 9,380 km in FY26 from 12,349 km in FY24, with delayed projects worth ₹4 trillion - half delayed by up to 6 months, others by 1-3 years.

The source text mentions 9,380 km in FY26 and 12,349 km in FY24, but the delayed projects worth ₹4 trillion are as of end-July 2025, not specifically linked to FY26. Severity: medium

580 national highway projects were delayed as of July 2025, with land acquisition (33%), contractor issues, and forest clearances (33%) being primary causes.

The source text confirms 580 delayed projects by end-July 2025 and the causes, but the percentages are not explicitly mentioned in the source. Severity: low

The policy aligns with National Infrastructure Pipeline goals by reducing average project delays from 3+ years (85 projects) through systematic de-risking.

The source mentions 85 projects delayed by over 3 years, but does not explicitly link this to the National Infrastructure Pipeline goals. Severity: low