Supreme Court Advocates Uniform Civil Code to Address Gender Bias in Personal Laws

Updated 12 Mar 2026

Contents4

Hindustan Times - India · 12 Mar 2026 · 2 min read
Prelims · Polity Mains · GS2 Polity and constitution High relevance

The Supreme Court suggested that a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) could resolve gender discrimination in personal laws, referencing Article 44 of the Constitution during a hearing on Muslim inheritance rules.

Key points

Supreme Court observed that a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) may be necessary to address gender discrimination in personal laws, particularly in Muslim inheritance rules.

The bench, led by CJI Surya Kant, emphasized Article 44 of the Constitution, which directs the State to secure a UCC for all citizens.

The petition challenged provisions of Muslim personal law under the Shariat Application Act, 1937, arguing they deny women equal inheritance rights.

The court referenced the Narasu Appa Mali judgment, which held that uncodified personal laws are not subject to constitutional scrutiny.

[GS2-Polity] The debate connects to Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) under Article 44, highlighting the tension between DPSPs and fundamental rights.

The bench cautioned against judicial overreach, noting that striking down personal laws without a legislative alternative could create a legal vacuum.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan argued that inheritance is a civil right, not protected under Article 25 (freedom of religion), citing the Shayara Bano case (2017).

Uttarakhand has already implemented a UCC, while Gujarat has formed a committee to draft one, signaling state-level momentum.

[GS1-Society] The issue reflects broader societal challenges in balancing gender justice with religious autonomy in a pluralistic democracy.

Way Forward: Parliament should prioritize drafting a gender-just UCC, consult stakeholders to ensure inclusivity, and codify Muslim personal law to eliminate ambiguities.

Key terms

Shariat Application Act, 1937
A law that applies Islamic personal law to Muslims in India in matters like marriage, divorce, and inheritance. Critics argue it perpetuates gender discrimination, particularly in inheritance rights.
Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP)
Non-justiciable guidelines under Part IV of the Constitution that direct the State to promote welfare and social justice. Article 44 (UCC) is one such principle, reflecting the constitutional vision of legal uniformity.
Uniform Civil Code (UCC)
A proposed common set of laws governing marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption for all citizens, irrespective of religion. Under Article 44 of the Constitution, it is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Its implementation remains contentious due to concerns over religious autonomy and gender justice.
Article 44
A Directive Principle of State Policy in the Indian Constitution that urges the State to secure a Uniform Civil Code for citizens. While not enforceable, it guides legislative action to harmonize personal laws across communities.

Practice question

Critically analyze the implications of implementing a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India, with reference to the recent Supreme Court observations on gender bias in personal laws. (250 words, 15 marks)

GS2 15 marks 250 words Mains

Key terms to include: Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Article 44 Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) Shariat Application Act, 1937 Narasu Appa Mali judgment Gender justice Religious autonomy Judicial overreach

Answer framework

Introduction

Briefly introduce the concept of UCC and its constitutional basis under Article 44. Mention the recent Supreme Court observations on gender bias in personal laws.

Constitutional and Legal Dimensions

Article 44 of the Constitution directs the State to secure a UCC for all citizens.

Reference to the Narasu Appa Mali judgment and its implications on uncodified personal laws.

The role of Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) in guiding legislative action.

Gender Justice and Equality

Addressing gender discrimination in personal laws, particularly in Muslim inheritance rules.

The petition challenging provisions of the Shariat Application Act, 1937, for denying women equal inheritance rights.

The Supreme Court's emphasis on gender justice as a fundamental right.

Challenges and Concerns

Balancing religious autonomy with gender justice in a pluralistic democracy.

Potential judicial overreach and the risk of creating a legal vacuum without legislative alternatives.

State-level initiatives like Uttarakhand's UCC and Gujarat's committee, signaling momentum but also fragmentation.

Conclusion

Suggest a way forward, emphasizing the need for a consultative and inclusive approach to drafting a UCC that ensures gender justice while respecting religious diversity.

Fact check

All facts verified