TMC Factional Dispute Tests Anti-Defection Law and Party Constitution Validity

Updated 26 Jun 2026

Contents4

Livemint - Politics · 26 Jun 2026 · 2 min read
Prelims · Polity Mains · GS2 Polity and constitution High relevance

A rebel faction within the Trinamool Congress declared itself the 'real TMC' and removed Mamata Banerjee as chairperson, raising legal questions under the Tenth Schedule and Election Commission's Symbols Order.

Key points

Rebel Faction led by expelled MLA Ritabrata Banerjee convened a meeting with 60 MLAs and 70 councillors, declaring itself the legitimate TMC and appointing Arup Roy as chairperson.

Legal Basis: The faction cites Article 20 of the TMC constitution, claiming the National Working Committee expired in February 2026, rendering the official leadership invalid.

Official TMC Response dismissed the move as illegal, with spokesperson Kunal Ghosh calling it a 'comedy show' and asserting Mamata Banerjee remains chairperson per submitted office-bearer lists.

Supreme Court Precedent: The 2023 Shiv Sena split case established that disciplinary powers reside with the original party organization, not the legislative party, limiting rebels' legal standing.

Election Commission Role: The rebels must submit committee records to the ECI for evaluation under the Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, to gain formal recognition.

Anti-Defection Law: Rebel MLAs risk disqualification under the Tenth Schedule if found violating party whip before securing ECI recognition, as official TMC pursues disqualification proceedings.

[GS2-Polity] This connects to constitutional governance questions on party splits, testing the balance between internal democracy and anti-defection safeguards.

Way Forward: The ECI should expedite recognition decisions to prevent prolonged instability, while parties must codify clearer succession rules in their constitutions to prevent factional disputes.

Key terms

National Working Committee
The apex decision-making body in political parties like TMC, responsible for organizational and policy decisions. Its composition and renewal processes, as per party constitutions, determine leadership legitimacy during internal disputes.
Article 20 of TMC Constitution
This provision mandates the National Working Committee's renewal every three years. Its interpretation becomes critical in factional disputes, as expiration claims can be used to challenge incumbent leadership's validity.
Tenth Schedule
The Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, added by the 52nd Amendment Act, 1985, contains anti-defection provisions to prevent elected members from switching parties. It mandates disqualification for voluntarily giving up party membership or voting against party directives, crucial for maintaining political stability.
Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968
This ECI order governs the recognition of political parties and allotment of election symbols. It resolves disputes over party legitimacy by evaluating factional claims based on numerical strength and constitutional adherence, ensuring electoral clarity.

Practice question

Critically analyze the legal and constitutional challenges posed by factional disputes within political parties, with reference to the recent TMC leadership crisis. (250 words, 15 marks)

GS2 15 marks 250 words Mains

Key terms to include: Tenth Schedule Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 National Working Committee Article 20 of TMC Constitution Anti-Defection Law Election Commission of India Shiv Sena split case Internal Party Democracy

Answer framework

Introduction

Briefly introduce the context of the TMC factional dispute and its implications for political stability and constitutional governance.

Legal Framework and Anti-Defection Law

Role of the Tenth Schedule in preventing defections and maintaining party discipline.

Challenges in applying anti-defection laws to factional disputes, as seen in the Shiv Sena split case.

Election Commission's Role

ECI's authority under the Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 to adjudicate factional claims.

Importance of timely decisions by ECI to prevent prolonged political instability.

Internal Party Democracy

Issues arising from ambiguous party constitutions, e.g., Article 20 of TMC constitution regarding National Working Committee renewal.

Need for clearer succession rules and internal dispute resolution mechanisms within parties.

Judicial Precedents

Impact of Supreme Court rulings (e.g., Shiv Sena case) on defining leadership legitimacy during splits.

Balancing judicial intervention with political party autonomy.

Conclusion

Suggest reforms such as codifying clearer party constitutions and expediting ECI processes, while maintaining a balance between anti-defection safeguards and internal party democracy.

Fact check

All facts verified