Consider the following statements: 1. The Council of Ministers in the Centre shall be collectively responsible to the Parliament. 2. The Union Ministers shall hold the office during the pleasure of the President of India. 3. The Prime Minister shall communicate to the President about the proposals for legislation. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Updated 11 Apr 2026

Contents16
UPSC Prelims GS2013Indian Polity
  1. A1 only
  2. B2 and 3 only
  3. C1 and 3 only
  4. D1, 2 and 3
Show answer

Answer: (B) 2 and 3 only

Statement 1 is tricky and wrong as worded.

Article 75(3) says the Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the 'House of the People' (Lok Sabha), NOT to 'Parliament' as a whole.

Parliament includes both Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha, but collective responsibility is specifically to the Lok Sabha only.

This is a common UPSC trap.

Statement 2 is correct — Article 75(2) says Union Ministers hold office during the pleasure of the President.

Statement 3 is correct — Article 78 says the Prime Minister shall communicate to the President all decisions relating to administration and proposals for legislation.

So statements 2 and 3 are correct.

Why this was asked

The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the Lok Sabha, not to Parliament as a whole, despite Parliament including both houses.

UPSC frequently uses the word 'Parliament' instead of 'Lok Sabha' to test whether students know collective responsibility applies specifically to the lower house only.

This tests precise constitutional vocabulary where similar terms like Parliament vs Lok Sabha have different legal meanings.

Collective Responsibility of Council of Ministers

Indian Polity Council of Ministers collectively responsible Parliament

Collective Responsibility: Council of Ministers to Lok Sabha Only

Must know

Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to Lok Sabha only, not entire Parliament

Article 75(3) uses term 'House of the People' (Lok Sabha), not 'Parliament'

Rajya Sabha cannot pass vote of no confidence against Council of Ministers

Good to know

If Lok Sabha passes no confidence motion, entire Council must resign

Constitutional Provision

Article 75(3) states that the Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the People (Lok Sabha). This is the cornerstone of India's parliamentary system — the executive derives its legitimacy from the directly elected lower house.

Responsibility Framework

Aspect

To Lok Sabha

To Rajya Sabha

Constitutional Basis

Collective Responsibility

Yes

No

Article 75(3)

Vote of No Confidence

Can pass

Cannot pass

Article 75(3)

Individual Responsibility

Yes

Limited

Parliamentary convention

Question Hour

Yes

Yes

Rules of Procedure

Why Only Lok Sabha

Direct mandate: Lok Sabha members are directly elected by people, giving them democratic legitimacy to hold executive accountable

Money Bills: Lok Sabha has exclusive power over money matters, so executive (which controls finances) must be responsible to it

Westminster model: India follows UK parliamentary system where executive is responsible to lower house only

Exam traps

Trap: Statement uses 'Parliament' instead of 'Lok Sabha' — Constitution specifically says 'House of the People'

Confusion: Students think 'collective responsibility to Parliament' sounds correct because ministers answer questions in both houses

Key distinction: Answering questions ≠ collective responsibility — only Lok Sabha can remove government

Ministers' Tenure - President's Pleasure

Indian Polity Union Ministers pleasure of the President

Union Ministers Hold Office During President's Pleasure

Must know

Article 75(2): Union Ministers hold office during pleasure of President

President acts on Prime Minister's advice in practice for dismissals

Good to know

No fixed tenure — ministers can be removed anytime without assigning reasons

Constitutional Framework

Article 75(2) clearly states that Ministers hold office during the pleasure of the President. This means the President has the constitutional power to dismiss any minister at any time without assigning reasons.

Comparison of Tenure

Position

Tenure

Removal Authority

Constitutional Article

Prime Minister

Pleasure of President

President (on Lok Sabha's loss of confidence)

Article 75

Union Ministers

Pleasure of President

President (on PM's advice)

Article 75(2)

Supreme Court Judges

Till age 65

Parliament (impeachment)

Article 124

CAG

6 years or age 65

Parliament (impeachment)

Article 148

Practical Reality

PM's recommendation: President removes ministers only on Prime Minister's advice in practice

Cabinet reshuffle: PM uses this power during cabinet reshuffles to drop non-performing ministers

No security of tenure: Unlike judges, ministers have no constitutional protection against arbitrary removal

Exam traps

Students confuse: Ministers' tenure with MPs' tenure — MPs have 5-year term, ministers don't

Common error: Thinking ministers hold office 'during pleasure of PM' — Constitution says 'President'

PM's Communication Duties to President

Indian Polity Prime Minister communicate President proposals for legislation

Prime Minister's Constitutional Duty to Inform President

Must know

Article 78: PM must communicate all decisions and legislative proposals to President

President has right to be informed about all government activities

Good to know

PM must furnish information when President seeks it

Constitutional Mandate

Article 78 creates a constitutional bridge between the President (ceremonial head) and the Prime Minister (real executive head). The PM must keep the President informed to maintain constitutional propriety in India's parliamentary system.

PM's Communication Duties

What PM Must Communicate

Constitutional Provision

Purpose

All decisions relating to administration

Article 78(a)

Keep President informed

Proposals for legislation

Article 78(b)

Presidential assent process

Information when President seeks

Article 78(c)

President's right to be consulted

Matters decided by individual minister if President asks

Article 78(c)

Collective decision-making

Practical Importance

Weekly meetings: PM typically meets President weekly to brief on major decisions and policies

Legislative process: President needs information before giving assent to bills passed by Parliament

Constitutional head: President represents India internationally, so must be aware of government positions

Exam traps

Students miss: This is a constitutional duty, not just political courtesy

Scope confusion: Article 78 covers both administrative decisions AND legislative proposals

Parliament vs Lok Sabha - Key Distinction

Indian Polity Parliament Lok Sabha

Parliament vs Lok Sabha: Critical UPSC Distinction

Must know

Parliament = Lok Sabha + Rajya Sabha + President (in legislative capacity)

Lok Sabha = House of the People, lower house, directly elected

Constitution uses specific terms — 'Parliament' and 'Lok Sabha' are not interchangeable

Constitutional Definition

Article 79 defines Parliament as consisting of the President and two Houses — Rajya Sabha (Council of States) and Lok Sabha (House of the People). When the Constitution says 'Parliament', it means all three components together.

Powers Exclusive to Each

Power/Function

Parliament (Both Houses)

Lok Sabha Only

Rajya Sabha Only

Money Bills

No

Yes (Article 109)

No

No Confidence Motion

No

Yes (Article 75)

No

Impeachment (President/Judges)

Yes (both houses)

Initiates charges

Conducts trial

Constitutional Amendments

Yes (special majority)

Equal power

Equal power

All India Services

No

No

Yes (Article 312)

Parliament Structure

# Parliament (Article 79)
## President
- Legislative capacity only
- Assent to bills
- Summons Parliament
## Rajya Sabha
- 245 members max
- Indirectly elected
- 6-year term
- Permanent body
## Lok Sabha
- 552 members max
- Directly elected
- 5-year term
- Can be dissolved
Exam traps

Major trap: Questions use 'Parliament' when answer requires 'Lok Sabha' — read carefully

Collective responsibility trap: Council responsible to 'Lok Sabha', not 'Parliament'

Money Bill trap: 'Lok Sabha' has exclusive power, not 'Parliament'

Terminology precision: Constitution uses exact terms — 'House of the People' means Lok Sabha