Consider the following statements with reference to India: 1. According to the 'Micro Small and Medium enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006, the 'medium enterprises' are those with investments in plant and machinery between Rs. 15 crore and Rs. 25 crore. 2. All bank loans to the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises qualify under the Priority sector. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Updated 11 Apr 2026 · From UPSC Prelims GS Paper I 2023, Q53

Contents15
UPSC Prelims GS2023Indian Economy
  1. A1 Only
  2. B2 Only
  3. CBoth 1 and 2
  4. DNeither 1 nor 2
Show answer

Answer: (B) 2 Only

Statement 1 is incorrect:

The investment limits mentioned in the statement are outdated and incorrect. (as announced in the Atmnirbhar Bharat package on 13th May, 2020)

After the revision of MSME definitions in 2020, a medium enterprise is defined as one with:

  • investment in plant and machinery or equipment up to ₹50 crore, and
  • turnover up to ₹250 crore.

Therefore, the statement that medium enterprises are those with investments between ₹15 crore and ₹25 crore is incorrect.

Statement 2 is correct:

Under the Priority Sector Lending (PSL) guidelines of the RBI, bank loans provided to eligible Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) qualify under the priority sector.

Thus, loans to MSMEs are included within priority sector lending norms.

Therefore:

  • Statement 1 is incorrect.
  • Statement 2 is correct.

Hence, the correct answer is 2 only.

Why this was asked

MSME definitions were revised in 2020 to increase investment limits and add turnover criteria, making the old 2006 Act definitions outdated.

The government revised MSME definitions in 2020 during COVID-19 to help more businesses qualify for MSME benefits and easier credit access.

UPSC is testing whether students know the current MSME classification versus the original 2006 Act definitions.

MSME Classification & Investment Limits

Indian Economy MSMED Act medium enterprises plant and machinery Rs. 15 crore Rs. 25 crore

MSME Classification: 2020 Revised Criteria & Investment Limits

Must know

2020 revision replaced investment-only criteria with composite criteria (investment + turnover)

Medium enterprises: investment up to ₹50 crore AND turnover up to ₹250 crore

Manufacturing vs Services distinction was removed in 2020

Good to know

Both criteria must be satisfied simultaneously

Key Change in 2020

The MSMED Act 2006 was revised in 2020 to introduce composite criteria combining both investment and turnover limits. The old system had separate definitions for manufacturing and services, creating confusion.

Current MSME Classification (2020)

Category

Investment Limit

Turnover Limit

Both Must Be Satisfied

Micro

Up to ₹1 crore

Up to ₹5 crore

✓

Small

Up to ₹10 crore

Up to ₹50 crore

✓

Medium

Up to ₹50 crore

Up to ₹250 crore

✓

Old vs New System

Aspect

Old System (Pre-2020)

New System (2020)

Criteria

Investment only

Investment + Turnover

Manufacturing vs Services

Separate limits

Unified limits

Medium Enterprise Investment

₹5-10 crore (Mfg), ₹2-5 crore (Services)

Up to ₹50 crore

Turnover Consideration

Not considered

Mandatory criterion

Question Analysis

Statement 1 trap: Uses old investment range (₹15-25 crore) which never existed in any MSME classification

Current reality: Medium enterprises can invest up to ₹50 crore (5x higher than statement)

Turnover ignored: Statement mentions only investment, but 2020 rules require both criteria

Exam traps

Trap: Statement uses ₹15-25 crore range which never existed in MSME classification

Confusion: Old system had different limits for manufacturing vs services — 2020 unified them

Missing criterion: Questions may mention only investment but turnover is equally important post-2020

Date confusion: 2020 revision is recent — many still remember old investment-only criteria

Priority Sector Lending to MSMEs

Indian Economy bank loans Priority sector Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

Priority Sector Lending: MSME Coverage & Bank Obligations

Must know

Not all MSME loans qualify for priority sector — only loans up to ₹7.5 crore

Banks must lend 18% of ANBC to MSMEs under priority sector

₹7.5 crore limit applies to both manufacturing and service MSMEs

Good to know

Loans above ₹7.5 crore to MSMEs are regular commercial loans

Core Concept

Priority Sector Lending (PSL) mandates banks to lend a minimum percentage to specified sectors. For MSMEs, there's a ₹7.5 crore ceiling — loans beyond this amount don't count toward PSL targets even if given to valid MSMEs.

PSL Targets for Banks

Sector

Domestic Banks Target

Foreign Banks Target

Loan Limit for PSL

Total PSL

40% of ANBC

32% of ANBC

Various limits apply

MSMEs

7.5% of ANBC

7.5% of ANBC

Up to ₹7.5 crore

Micro Enterprises

7.5% of ANBC (within MSME)

7.5% of ANBC

Up to ₹10 lakh

Agriculture

18% of ANBC

No separate target

Up to ₹2 crore

Why Statement 2 is Wrong

₹7.5 crore ceiling: Medium enterprises can get loans up to ₹50+ crore, but only ₹7.5 crore qualifies for PSL

Large MSME loans excluded: A ₹20 crore loan to a medium enterprise won't count toward bank's PSL target

ANBC definition: Adjusted Net Bank Credit excludes investments in bonds, CDs, and other instruments

PSL Qualification Process

%%{init: {"flowchart": {"wrappingWidth": 460}}}%%
flowchart TD
  s1["`**Bank gives loan to MSME**
Loan can be of any amount`"]
  s2["`**Check loan amount**
Is it ₹7.5 crore or below?`"]
  s3["`**If ≤₹7.5 crore**
Qualifies for PSL target calculation`"]
  s4["`**If >₹7.5 crore**
Treated as regular commercial loan`"]
  s5["`**Bank reports PSL achievement**
Only qualifying portion counts toward 7.5% target`"]
  s1 --> s2
  s2 --> s3
  s3 --> s4
  s4 --> s5
Exam traps

Trap: 'All bank loans to MSMEs' — the word 'All' makes it wrong due to ₹7.5 crore limit

Size confusion: Medium enterprises can be large businesses — their loans may exceed PSL limits

Target vs Reality: Banks must achieve 7.5% MSME lending, but not every MSME loan counts

Recent change: ₹7.5 crore limit was revised upward — older limits were lower

MSMED Act 2006 & Policy Framework

Indian Economy MSMED Act, 2006

MSMED Act 2006: Framework, Provisions & Recent Updates

Must know

MSMED Act 2006 provides statutory framework for MSME definition and support

Delayed payment provisions — buyers must pay MSMEs within 45 days

Udyam Registration replaced earlier registration systems in 2020

Good to know

Act covers promotion, development and competitiveness of MSMEs

Legislative Framework

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 created India's first comprehensive legal framework for MSMEs. It replaced the Small Industries Development Act 1951 and brought services under formal MSME definition.

Key Provisions of MSMED Act

Provision

Details

Impact

Definition

Legal classification of MSMEs

Enables targeted policies

Registration

Udyam Registration (online, free)

Single window for benefits

Delayed Payments

45-day payment rule + interest

Protects MSME cash flow

Credit Guarantee

CGTMSE coverage up to ₹2 crore

Collateral-free lending

Reservation

Items reserved for MSME production

Market protection

Major Amendments & Updates

2018: Delayed payment period reduced from 90 to 45 days

2020: New composite criteria (investment + turnover) introduced

2020: Udyam Registration replaced EM-I and EM-II systems

Services inclusion: Act brought services sector under MSME ambit for first time

MSME Support Ecosystem

# MSMED Act 2006
## Financial Support
- PSL targets
- CGTMSE
- MUDRA loans
- SIDBI refinance
## Registration
- Udyam portal
- Aadhaar-based
- Free process
- Single window
## Market Access
- Govt procurement
- GeM portal
- Reservation policy
- Cluster development
## Legal Protection
- Delayed payment act
- Interest on delays
- MSME tribunals
- Dispute resolution
Exam traps

Year confusion: Act is 2006 but major revisions happened in 2018 and 2020

Payment period: Now 45 days (was 90 days earlier) — questions may use old timeframe

Registration names: Udyam (current) vs EM-I/EM-II (old) — know the transition

Services coverage: Act covers both manufacturing and services — wasn't always the case